Apple has announced made a handful of changes to its rules regarding dating app payments to comply with orders from the Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM). If you recall, regulators had ordered the tech giant to allow third-party payments on on-premises dating apps by January of this year. A Reuters The March report said the company has yet to comply with the orders in a way that really meets the regulator’s wishes — that is, until now.
In its announcement, Apple said it made adjustments to its third-party payment interface. As part of its efforts to comply with the ACM, it displays an alert when someone tries to pay with a third-party payment option and warns them that they must contact the developer for a refund. As Reuters notes that this warning originally came with a button that made it easy to cancel using an external payment system. The ACM reportedly disagreed with this button, so Apple had to remove it.
Apple also clarified in its post that even developers who are already paying lower cuts are eligible for the discounted commission rates they receive from third-party payments. When the company said it would honor ACM’s demands at the time, it revealed that developers who pay a 30 percent cut would only be billed 27 percent. However, it was not clear whether developers who already pay lower rates if they meet certain criteria, such as B. earn less than a million a year, will also benefit from the 3 percent discount. Apple made it clear in their announcement that they will actually pay lower commissions on third-party payments, so those who are only charged 15 percent only have to give the company 12 percent.
in one expression Published on its website, the ACM said that with these changes, Apple “will comply with the requirements that the Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) sets under European and Dutch competition rules.” The regulator also revealed that Apple had to pay fines totaling €50 million for failing to comply with the ACM’s requirements in recent months. However, Apple said it doesn’t believe some of the changes it’s had to implement are in the best interests of its users’ privacy or data security. “As we have said before,” the company added, “we disagree with ACM’s original order and are appealing it.”
This article was previously published on Source link
